United States v. Keys’s Empirical Analysis
67 F.3d 801 · 1995
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably United States v. Ross (1996), United States v. David (1996)
34 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1623 · 18 U.S.C. § 3584
Relies on United States v. Olano · United States v. Gaudin · United States v. Atkinson · Morris v. Slappy · Nix v. Whiteside
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“HeyG., I’ve got everything covered on my end and I’m ready whenever the time is right. I hope that I can really make a difference and you come out on top. Let me know how long you anticipate your thing to last, so I can figure out how long I’ll be here. I’m trying to stay as long as I possibly can and try to get a lot done while I’m here. I heard that R.R. left Fri. and he’s in Okla. right now. I’m also trying to get a few things from the commissary but they only let us order two cosmetics items a week. If you can hook it up right away I need you to have somebody send this girl some money upstairs, so I can have her get me everything I need from the commissary. It don’t have to be nothing but twenty or fifty dollars. That guy, P.S. Here’s her name and number: Jeanna Carson — Reg. No. 92373-012.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“COURT’S INSTRUCTION NO. 16 The defendant is charged in Count One of the indictment with having made a false declaration in violation of Section 1623 of title 18 of the United States Code. In order for the defendant to be found guilty of that charge, the government must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt: First, the defendant testified under oath before a court of the United States; Second, the testimony was false; and Third, the defendant knew that the testimony was false.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Constitution gives a criminal defendant the right to demand that a jury find him guilty of all the elements of the crime with which he is charged; one of the elements in the present case is materiality; respondent therefore had a right to have the jury decide materiality.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.