Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 F.3d 830 - Poolaw III v. Bishop 27

Poolaw III v. Bishop 27’s Empirical Analysis

67 F.3d 830 · 1995

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
June 2017
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Ml Cd Sl v. Federal Way School District (2004), Ms. S. v. Vashon Island School District (2003)

8 federal appellate · 3 district ·

160199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 20 U.S.C. § 1401 · 20 U.S.C. § 1412 · 20 U.S.C. § 1414 · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley · Hebert v. Brown · Daniel R.R. v. State Board of Education · Wg v. Board of Trustees of Target Range School District No Missoula Montana · Oberti v. Board Of Education

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a court's inquiry in suits brought under § 1415(e)(2) is twofold. First, has the State complied with the procedures set forth in the Act? And second, is the individualized educational program developed through the Act's procedures reasonably calculated to enable the child to receive educational benefits?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] district court's determination that a student is incapable of deriving educational benefits unless placed in a self contained program is reviewed for clear error.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The appropriateness of a special education placement under the IDEA is reviewed de novo.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.