Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Usfws’s Empirical Analysis
2023
Citation profile
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Arizona District Court)
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1532 (§ 3 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1533 (§ 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1536 (§ 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States · Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources Council · Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill · National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet Services
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.