Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

67 F. App'x 224

United States v. Thomas

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided June 20, 2003

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-06-20

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2003-06-20

PER CURIAM.

¶1 James Edward Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to show cause as to why it failed to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Thomas, No. CR-97-299-3 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/67/fappx/224 · .json · Public domain