Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 FRD 132 - Dabney v. Burrell

Dabney v. Burrell’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
April 2006
most recently cited

3 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2006

3 district · 6 state decisions

401975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · Killian v. United States · Christine M. Grunewald, Individually and as of the Will of Henry W. Grunewald, Deceased v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Missouri Corporation · Levine v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. · Brown v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Dismissal with prejudice is a drastic sanction. It is reserved for extreme situations where there is compelling evidence of willful default.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.