67 F. Supp. 2d 21 - Haidak v. Collagen Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 321 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360C (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360E (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360H (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360I (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360J (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360K (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Thomas v. Arn · San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon · Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.