67 Ga. App. 202 - McKenzie v. Perdue’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2006
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McDonald v. Dabney · Fricker v. Americus Manufacturing & Improvement Co. · Johns v. Johns · Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Central Trust Co. · 19 Ga. App. 21 - Brooke & Co. v. Cunningham Bros.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“finds as a conclusion of law that the defendant should be removed as executrix of the will of Emily Wooten Perdue, as well as trustee under said will.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perdue v. McKenzie“Consequently it has not been established that the minor plaintiff suffered any loss from the mere fact that the property was operated as a unit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perdue v. McKenzie“the controversy in this case was properly between the trustee under the will and the beneficiary,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Perdue v. McKenzie
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.