Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 Haw. 535 - State v. Phillips

State v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
4
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably State v. Bonnell (1993), State v. Kim (1985)

34 state decisions

1401985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carroll v. United States · United States v. Di Re · State v. Fields · State v. Ortiz · State v. Kender

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Probable cause .. . cxistfsj when the facts and circumstances within one’s knowledge and of which one has reasonably trustworthy information arc sufficient in themselves to warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that a crime [has been or is] being committed.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] search is not to be made legal by what it turns up”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Yet, an anonymous tip “is devoid of any of the underlying circumstances from which [an] officer can conclude that the informant was credible and his information reliable.” State v. Ward, 62 Haw. 509, 511 , 617 P.2d 568, 570 (1980). Moreover, the anonymous tip here “is devoid of any of the underlying circumstances which explain how the informant knew [the suspect was] committing a crime.” Id. Without more, a faceless informer’s tip does not give cause for the forcible stop of a person, let alone the search of his car. See State v. Temple, 65 Haw. 261, 271 , 650 P.2d 1358, 1364 (1982); State v.Joao, 55 Haw. 601, 603-04 , 525 P.2d 580, 582-83 (1974).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.