State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1947
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2011
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Fuller · State v. McLennan · State v. Brooks · State v. Monteith · Callahan v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * Before you can convict her of such offense you must find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following essential elements of that offense, to-wit: “1. That on or about the date specified in the information the defendant did sell liquor to Wesley Rudolph and Carl LaFitte, or either' of them. “2. That such sale took place within the county of Cassia, State of Idaho. “3. That at such time and place the defendant did not hold a license from the State of Idaho authorizing her to make such sale or sales.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.