67 Ill. 2d 107 - People v. White’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably 88 Ill. 2d 129 - People v. Lewis (1981), 75 Ill. 2d 383 - People v. Banks (1979)
40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Lloyd · 10 Ill. 2d 208 - The PEOPLE v. Lion · Bartholomew v. People · People v. Campbell · 29 Ill. 2d 74 - The PEOPLE v. Winters
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) A person commits robbery when he takes property from the person or presence of another by the use of force or by threatening the imminent use of force. (b) Sentence. Robbery is a Class 2 felony.” “(a) A person commits armed robbery when he violates Section 18 — 1 while armed with a dangerous weapon. (b) Sentence. Armed robbery is a Class 1 felony for which an offender may not be sentenced to death.” Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 38, pars. 18-1, 18-2.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““Robbery is the felonious and violent taking of money, goods or other valuable thing, from the person of another by force or intimidation. Every person guilty of robbery shall be imprisoned in the penitentiary not less than one year nor more than fourteen years; or if he is armed with a dangerous weapon, with intent, if resisted, to kill or maim ***.” (Emphasis added.) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1874, ch. 38, par. 246.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“"We find insufficient evidence in this record from which the trier of fact could find that defendant's intent to steal money from the victims, or in their presence, with force and intimidation, while armed with a dangerous weapon, was negated. The judgment of the appellate court is accordingly affirmed." 67 Ill.2d 107, 120 , 365 N.E.2d 337, 344 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.