Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 Ill. App. 2d 1 - Cuttone v. Peters

67 Ill. App. 2d 1 - Cuttone v. Peters’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
June 1982
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““After careful consideration, we feel that in this matter the interests of a plaintiff in a speedy and sure remedy must come before the interests of the insurance company. Should the underlying judgment be set aside the insurance company surely has a right of action against a plaintiff for recovery of any money it has paid. We must conclude that the opinion in the Ancateau case, supra, [ 318 Ill. App. 553 .] no longer represents the better law.” 67 Ill. App. 2d at 6 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.