Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 Ill. App. 3d 24 - People v. Jackson

67 Ill. App. 3d 24 - People v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2024

14 state decisions

60197919801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · Gilbert v. California · 47 Ill. 2d 300 - The PEOPLE v. Holiday

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In determining the propriety and appealability of orders granting motions to suppress, the fact that the motion to suppress is intended to reach only illegally obtained evidence has not always been kept in mind. In the present case, for example, the court characterized the distinction between the exclusion of evidence and its suppression as ‘merely semantic.’ This is not so, as was pointed out in People v. Thady (1971), 133 Ill. App. 2d 795 , and People v. Koch (1973), 15 Ill. App. 3d 386 . Rule 604 was not intended to give the State the right to an interlocutory appeal from every ruling excluding evidence offered by the prosecution.” 63 Ill. 2d 364, 368 , 349 N.E.2d 16, 19 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.