Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 INDAPP 438 - Fisher v. Carey

Fisher v. Carey’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
May 2007
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently May 2007 · most notably 156 Ind. App. 203 - Selvia v. Reitmeyer (1973), 154 Ind. App. 283 - Standard Land Corporation of Indiana v. Bogardus (1972)

27 state decisions

901918192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Wood · Carthage Turnpike Co. v. Andrews · Peabody-Alwert Coal Co. v. Yandell · Euler v. Euler · Graham v. Henderson Elevator Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although a party may have a legal remedy, injunctive relief may be granted, if such legal remedy is not as practicable, efficient, and adequate as that afforded, by equity. (Citing cases) Whether a complaining party has a legal remedy which will afford complete justice must be determined under all the circumstances of the case, and in view of the conduct of the parties. (Citing cases) Where there is a legal remedy, equity will frequently grant injunctive relief to prevent a multiplicity of suits.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . Where there is a legal remedy, equity will frequently grant injunctive relief to prevent a multiplicity of suits. . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.