Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 KAN 539 - Jenson v. Lee

Jenson v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1903

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
November 1968
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 1968

8 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

801903191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Behan · Fitzgerald v. Allen · Derby v. Johnson · McCullough v. Baker · Guerdon v. Corbett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Pleading the common counts is still sufficient in this state finder the code as it was at common law. If the defendant desired a full statement of the facts constituting the plaintiff’s cause of action he should have moved to make the petition more definite and certain. (Meagher v. Morgan, 3 Kan. 372 , 87 Am. Dec. 476 ; Water Power Co. v. McMurray, 24 id. 62; Barons v. Brown, 25 id. 410.) He failed to do this. Therefore the plaintiff was left at large in making his proof.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.