Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

67 Kan. 870

State v. Clark

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1903

Supreme Court of Kansas · decided 1903-11-07

<p>Appeal from Wilson district court; L. Stillwell, judge.</p>

Relies on State v. Pool Grinstead

Affirmed · Decided 1903-11-07

Per Curiam:

¶1Herbert H. Clark was arrested on the charge of libeling F. E. Lyster. The district court quashed the information, and the state appeals. The words complained of are as follows: “In 1901 I staked and tried to teach oil crushing there to one F, E. Lyster, to my regret, loss, and sorrow,” This language is not defamatory in itself, and, as there was no allegation that it tended to expose Lyster to public hatred, contempt, or ridicule, or deprive him of the benefits of public confidence and social intercourse, the information was insufficient, under the rule stated in The State v. Grinstead, 62 Kan. 593, 64 Pac. 49.

¶2The judgment is affirmed.

/67/kan/870 · .json · Public domain