Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 MASSAPPCT 10 - Commonwealth v. Hoyle

Commonwealth v. Hoyle’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Schoonejongen · Commonwealth v. Duquette · Commonwealth v. Lopez · Commonwealth v. Fanelli · Commonwealth v. Correa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Given the time lapse and the resulting lack of District Court records, ‘[t]he presumption of regularity and the policy of finality thus come into play ... to place on the defendant the requirement of showing some basis that adequately supports a negation of his convictions . . . .’ This presumption of regularity, normally afforded collateral review of proceedings in which the record has been lost or destroyed, stands, unless and until a defendant advances countervailing credible and persuasive evidence sufficient to rebut that presumption.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.