Ginsberg v. Blacker’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2022
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dwyer v. Globe Newspaper Co. · Commonwealth v. Delgado · New England Canteen Service, Inc. v. Ashley · Frizado v. Frizado · Commonwealth v. Gordon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he judge's questions during the hearing and her ultimate decision make it clear that she credited [the plaintiff's] version of the evidence and rejected [the defendant's] conflicting testimony”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“combined ... to create a picture of a volatile situation in which the possibility of physical abuse was present.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The defendant purports also to be challenging the February 14, 2005, ex parte abuse prevention order that was continued for one year by the March 4 order (both orders having been entered on essentially the same evidentiary basis). Assuming that such a separate challenge may be maintained , cf. Larkin v. Ayer Div. of the Dist. Ct. Dept ., 425 Mass. 1020 , 1020, 681 N.E.2d 817 (1997) ; Corrado [ ], 65 Mass. App. Ct. [at] 483, 841 N.E.2d 723 [ ], we need not address the issue because the defendant did not file a notice of appeal with respect to the ex parte order”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.