Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 MASSAPPCT 547 - Commonwealth v. Broomhead

Commonwealth v. Broomhead’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 2021

4 state decisions

20200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dwyer v. Globe Newspaper Co. · Commonwealth v. Azar · Commonwealth v. LeFave · Commonwealth v. Degro · Berry v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order to determine whether there has been a sufficient foundation for a missing witness instruction, we look at '(1) whether the case against the defendant is [so strong that,] faced with the evidence, the defendant would be likely to call the missing witness if innocent; (2) whether the evidence to be given by the missing witness is important, central to the case, or just collateral or cumulative; (3) whether the party who fails to call the witness has superior knowledge of the whereabouts of the witness; and (4) whether the party has a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.