Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 MD 222 - Gaither v. Stockbridge

Gaither v. Stockbridge’s Empirical Analysis

1887

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
December 2005
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 6 district · 46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2005 · most notably Price v. United States (1926), Quincy Co v. Humphreys (1892)

8 federal appellate · 6 district · 46 state decisions

1401887189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Buckey v. Snouffer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““His [the receiver’s] appointment does not change the title to the property, or create any lien upon the same, in favor of any of the parties interested; his holding being for the benefit of the party who may be ultimately determined to be entitled.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The ordinary chancery receiver, such as we have in this case, is clothed with no estate in the property, but is a mere custodian of it for the .court; and, by special authority, may become an officer of the court to effect a sale of the property, if that be deemed necessary for the benefit of the parties concerned. If the order of the court, under which the receiver acts, embraces the leasehold estate, it becomes his duty, of course, to take possession of it. But he does not, by taking such possession, become assignee of the term, in any proper sense of the word. He holds that, as lie would hold any other personal property involved, for and as the hand of the court, and not as assignee of the term.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.