Muhr v. Pinover’s Empirical Analysis
1887
Citation profile
4 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2010
4 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The object of the law [creating an exemption] was to prevent a debtor from being stripped of all his property, and it ought to be liberally construed. (Emphasis added.).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Solomon“to protect from execution a reasonable amount of the property of the debtor,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Taylor“not exceeding in value the sum of five hundred dollars.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In Re Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.