Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 N.C. App. 148 - State v. Forehand

67 N.C. App. 148 - State v. Forehand’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
October 2008
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois · Illinois Cent Co v. State of Illinois City of Chicago · Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway Commission · Board of Transportation v. Martin · BARRETT ROBERT & WOODS, INC. v. Armi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]o recover under G.S. § 136-112(1) the area affected and the area taken must constitute a single tract. Unity of ownership is an important criterion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “determination of ownership of the area affected [but not taken] is a prerequisite to a determination of just compensation for the area taken.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the State holds title to the submerged lands under navigable waters, “but it is a title of a different character than that which it holds in other lands. It is a title held in trust for the people of the state so that they may navigate, fish, and carry on commerce in the waters involved.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.