Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 N.C. App. 549 - State v. Mitchell

67 N.C. App. 549 - State v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably 78 N.C. App. 753 - State v. Daye (1986), 157 N.C. App. 90 - State v. Hargett (2003)

28 state decisions

801984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Pearce · State v. Ahearn · 66 N.C. App. 298 - State v. Baucom · 62 N.C. App. 21 - State v. Mitchell · 38 N.C. App. 108 - State v. Lewis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"For all intents and purposes the resentencing hearing is de novo as to the appropriate sentence. On resentencing the judge makes a new and fresh determination of the presence in the evidence of aggravating and mitigating factors. The judge has discretion to accord to a given factor either more or less weight than a judge, or the same judge, may have given at the first hearing. However, in the process of weighing and balancing the factors found on rehearing the judge cannot impose a sentence greater than the original sentence."”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “These two aggravating factors were among those found at the first hearing. In the first appeal these same factors were analyzed and found to be without error. Thus, under the doctrine of the law of the case the earlier ruling of approval is binding upon us.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.