State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
2 district · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2016 · most notably Baxter v. Palmigiano (1976), 16 Cal. 3d 101 - People v. Disbrow (1976)
2 district · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Katz v. United States · Bruton v. United States · Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Harris ... is a valuable truth-finding mechanism which does not impinge on a defendant's federal or state constitutional rights. Nor do we think that Evidence Rules 25, 37 and 38 [currently New Jersey Rules of Evidence 503, 530, and 531] call for a different result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Burris“[i]f the statements are irreconcilable it may indicate that the prior statement was false rather than the latter, a realistic possibility where the prior statement was made under the subtly coercive circumstances of the station house interrogation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Burris“It is a common phenomenon in the law that evidence probative as to substantive issues or the credibility of a witness is excluded because its admission would conflict with other important policies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Deatore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.