State v. DiCarlo’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 54 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently September 2016 · most notably State v. Dively (1983), 152 N.J. Super. 471 - Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc. (1977)
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 54 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 801 (§ 101 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Sisson · Reilly v. Ozzard · State v. Reed · State v. Provenzano · State v. Meinken
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[L]aws enacted for wholly different ends will normally not justify applying the rule.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“so altering his or her normal physical coordination and mental faculties as to render such person a danger to himself as well as to other persons on the highway.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]t's clear that whether you call it a cocaine hangover, or simply part of the continuum of the physical manifestations of significant cocaine consumption, that the defendant was operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of cocaine at the time of the stop . . . [f]or this reason, I do find that the State has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant was under the influence and that he is guilty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.