In Re Arndt’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably AIRWORK SER. DIV., ETC. v. Director, Div. of Taxation (1984), In Re Kallen (1983)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. Burson · Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. · Rodriguez v. ROSENBLATT · Monks v. New Jersey State Parole Board · Atkinson v. Parsekian
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have, moreover not hesitated (as a matter of judicial policy) to impose principles of fundamental procedural fairness on administrative agencies and trial tribunals beyond constitutional demands.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“within a reasonable time and ... the proceedings as a whole were conducted with seriously unfair disregard of [the motorist's] rights,... the order of suspension should be vacated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“evince[d] an entire lack of that acute appreciation of justice which should characterize a tribunal charged with [such a] delicate and important duty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.