Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 NY 218 - Thomas v. . People

Thomas v. . People’s Empirical Analysis

1876

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
24
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2010 · most notably Henderson v. Morgan (1976), Ponzi v. Fessenden (1922)

4 federal appellate · 49 state decisions — followed in 24 states

130187618801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact that the prisoner plunged this pointed knife into what he knew to be a vital part of the body must raise a presumption that he intended to take life. Its natural result would be to destroy life, and he must be presumed to have intended the natural consequence of his act just as if he had aimed at the heart of the deceased and fired a gun. It was not charged that the evidence was conclusive, but simply that it was presumptive, and it was left to the jury to determine the fact upon the evidence under the charge as given.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““This is a novel claim and seems to be based upon the idea that a'prisoner under sentence has a right to serve out his term. He has no such right. His term of service may be curtailed by legislation or by executive pardon, or he may be turned loose by the courts or the prison officials without violating any of his legal rights. Convicts, like other persons, are under the protection of the law, and are amenable to its penalties. The laws for the punishment of crimes are general and apply to all persons in the State. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.