67 N.Y. Sup. Ct.
Volume 67 — New York Supreme Court Reports
235 opinions
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 298In re the Probate of an Instrument Alleged to be the Last Will & Testament of Westurn (1891)
Appeal by tbe contestants, Harvey Westurn, Elmer Westurn, Adele Carney, Clement Westurn and Herbert Westurn, nephews and nieces of Samuel Westurn, deceased, from a decree, entered in the office of the surrogate of Warren county on the 24th day of November, 1890, admitting to probate the alleged will of Samuel Westurn after a trial in the Surrogate’s Court of Warren county.
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 350Demings v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias of the World (1891)
Appeal by tbe defendant, the Supreme Lodge Knigbts of Pythias ■of the World, from a judgment, entered in the clerk’s office of Erie county on the 1st day of October, 1890, in favor of the plaintiff for $1,364.73, after a trial at the Erie Circuit before the court and a jury; and also from an order, entered in said clerk’s office on the 17th day of October, 1890, denying the motion of the defendant for a new trial upon the minutes of the court.
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 420In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Rosa (1891)
<p>Appeal by Mary R. Yarian and Charles E. Thomson, as administrators of Thomas Thomson, deceased; "Walter Yan Loan, as administrator of Charlotte S. Thomson, deceased, and Adelia Yan Wyck, as executrix of Delia Yan Wyck, deceased, from a decree entered in the surrogate’s office of Dutchess county on the 6th day of May, 1891, settling the account of Hyman B. Rosa, as executor of Amelia Caroline Griffin, deceased, and directing the distribution of a fund to certain corporations, legatees named in her will, fro rata.</p>
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 422Malloy v. Board of Health (1891)
Appeal by tbe plaintiffs, Frank W. Malloy and William Y. Malloy, from a judgment entered in the office of the clerk of Westchester county on the 4th day of April, 1891, in favor of the defendant, for costs, after a trial at the Westchester Circuit before the court and a jury. The defendant accepted the plaintiffs’ bid to build a sewer in the town of Mamaroneck for $445, which sewer was to drain certain cellars which had been declared by defendant to be a nuisance.
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 481Schwab v. Adler (1891)
Appeal by Caroline Schwab, executrix of the last will and testament of Solomon Adler, deceased, from an order entered in the surrogate’s office of the county of New York on the 29th day of April, 1891, denying her motion that said sui’rogate should give directions concerning the custody of the money and other property belonging to the estate of Solomon Adler, deceased.
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 510In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Green (1891)
Appeal by Leroy D. Green, an infant and person interested in this accounting, by Rollin M. Morgan, his special guardian and his guardian ad litem, from that part of a decree entered in the office of the surrogate of the county of New York which overrules the exceptions, taken to the referee’s report herein, filed by Rollin M. Morgan, as special guardian for George H. Green and Leroy D. Green, infants, whereby said Rollin M. Morgan, as such special guardian, excepts to the…
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 516In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Hart (1891)
<p>Exeeutors and administrators — duty of, in respect to a fraudulent transfer made by the decedent — objections filed against an account■ — amendments thereto mmo pro tunc.</p> <p>In proceedings taken in a Surrogate’s Court for tlie settlement of tlie accounts, and tlie discharge of certain administrators, it appeared that the intestate had been insolvent for years prior to his death, to the knowledge of the administrators, and that three years before his death the intestate had conveyed to a third person, for a nominal consideration, an apparently valuable interest in a leasehold estate; that the third person, upon the same day and upon a like consideration, conveyed this interest to the wife of the intestate.</p> <p>Beld, that it was the duty of the administrators to take legal proceedings to recover the property, upon the ground that it had been disposed of in fraud of the creditors of the intestate, and that, they having failed to do so, it was error for the Surrogate’s Court to discharge them as administrators.</p> <p>The account of an executor or an administrator, and the objections filed against it, constitute, in a Surrogate’s Court, the pleadings in the matter, and the party objecting is bound to file proper objections if he desires to have them considered.</p> <p>Where proper objections have not been filed the appellate court, although it may have power to amend them nunc pro tuna in support of a decree, will never do-so in order to justify the reversal of the decision below.</p>
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 566In re Tyler (1891)
<p>Appeal by Moses Coit Tyler, as ancillary administrator, with the will annexed, of John Tyler, deceased, from an order, entered in the clerk’s office of Tompkins county on the 8th day of December, 1890, denying his application for a writ of mandamus to the Board of Supervisors of Tompkins County, requiring it to audit and pay a claim of said John Tyler for services while acting as surrogate in the county of Tompkins.</p> <p>In the year 1888 John Tyler was the special county judge of the county of Tompkins, receiving a salary as such. From February 9, 1888, to March eighth of the same year, Hon. Marcus Lyon, the county judge and surrogate of that county, was absent from the county. During his absence the special county judge on certain days performed acts of an official character as acting surrogate. On other days he neither performed nor assumed to perform any official acts whatever. He was a practicing lawyer in Ithaca, had a separate office, and occasionally during the time went to the county judge’s office and performed acts as surrogate.</p> <p>There was a duly appointed clerk of the Surrogate’s Court during all that time who received a salary from the county. The salary of the Tompkins county judge and surrogate is $2,500 per annum. No order or proof was obtained,, or made as required by sections 2481 and 2488 of the Code of Civil Procedure authorizing or entitling the special county judge to act as surrogate of Tompkins county.</p> <p>On the 17th of November, 1888, John Tyler presented to the board of supervisors of Tompkins county a duly verified claim for $208.33 as compensation for the services alleged to have been rendered. This claim was for the entire time the county judge was absent. It was rejected by the board. Subsequently the legislature passed an act legalizing the official acts performed by John Tyler as acting surrogate between January 1, 1886, and January 1, 1889. (Laws 1889, chap. 221.)</p> <p>JolnvTyler died in the month of August, 1889, in the State of Michigan, where he then resided, leaving a last will and testament. On November 1, 1890, ancillary letters of administration, with the will annexed, were duly issued to Moses 0. Tyler -within the State of New York. The ancillary administrator, on the 12th of November, 1890, presented this claim to the board of supervisors, and it was again rejected. Thereupon Tyler, as such administrator, procured .an order to show cause before a Special Term of this court why a ■mandamus should not issue to compel the board of supervisors to raise by taxation an amount sufficient to pay such claim. Upon the return of the order to show cause the respondent appeared, and •certain 'affidavits were read in opposition to the application of the appellant. The appellant’s motion was denied. It is from this order that the appellant appealed.</p>
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Cuthbert v. Ives (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Reeves (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Schultheis v. Webster (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Howe v. Moore (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577In re the Last Will of De Russey (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577People v. McElroy (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Claflin v. Eagan (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Brooks v. Terry (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Foster v. Wetmore (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Grenell v. Stillwell (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Hodge v. Drake (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Post (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Lamb v. Lamb (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Marrone v. New York Jockey Club (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Martin v. Cook (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. National Steamship Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577People ex rel. Butts v. MacLean (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577People ex rel. Martin v. Gilon (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577People v. Hagan (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Richards v. Moore (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Ross v. Willett (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Sawyer v. Clark (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Simis v. McElroy (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Sleeman v. Hotchkiss (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Smith v. Lennon (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Suburban Rapid Transit Co. v. Mayor of New York (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Todd v. Union Dime Savings Institution (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577Tucker v. Gilman (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Landon v. Townsend (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Parker v. Lithgoe (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578People ex rel. Cochrane v. Coleman (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578People v. Suydam (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578United States National Bank v. Ewing (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Cammerer v. Muller (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Childs v. Latham (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Colvill v. Chubb (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Darling v. Howe (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Dutenhofer v. Adirondack Railway Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Galle v. Tode (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Grinnell v. Sherman (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Hasbrouck v. Young (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Higgins v. Mayor of New York (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Hill v. Knickerbocker Electric Light & Power Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Husted v. Cruikshank (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578In re Matilda (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Leary v. Melcher (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Lyons v. Atlanta Hill Gold Mining & Milling Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Martin v. Adams (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578McCulloh v. Palliard Non-Magnetic Watch Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578National Broadway Bank v. Barker (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Newwitter v. Mansell (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Nordlinger v. McKim (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Paine v. Aldrich (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578People ex rel. Demarest v. Gorman (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578People ex rel. Taylor v. MacLean (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578People v. Noonan (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Rector of the Holy Trinity Church v. Rector of the Church of St. Stephen (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Veterans of the Seventh Regiment v. Field Officers of the Seventh Regiment (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Vietor v. Halstead (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Wheatland v. Pryor (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Williams v. United States Trust Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 578Zimmerman v. Jourgenson (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Claim of Harris v. Estate of Harris (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Clemans v. Supreme Assembly Royal Society of Good Fellows (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Gillen v. Hamlin Babcock (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579In re the Probate of the Alleged Will of Mahoney (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Orr v. St. Anthony's Roman Catholic Church (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Smith v. Fowler (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Thorn v. Beard (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Ackerly & Gerard Co. v. Portz (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Bennett v. Village of Sing Sing (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Board of Health v. Valentine (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Boggs v. Bird (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Hughes v. McKenzie (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Palmeri v. Manhattan Railway Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579People ex rel. Compten v. Hegeman (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579People v. Cassidy (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579People v. Tanner (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Russell v. Bardes (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Schwenk v. Widemeyer (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Smith v. Smith (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Tallmadge v. Press Publishing Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Thompson v. Leslie (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Velsor v. Eaton (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Briggs v. Lawson (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Brown v. Baucus (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Downs v. Wells (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Griffin v. Todd (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Henderson v. McReynolds (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Hommert v. Gleason (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579In re Estate of Denton (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579In re Estate of Whittemore (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579In re Revocation of Probate of Will of Watson (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Kitson v. Blake (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Loeser v. Liebmann (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579McLaren v. Stokes (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Meyer v. Hunt (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Miller v. Wright (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Mulligan v. Long Island Railroad (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Stegman v. Hollingsworth (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Tidden v. Raab (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Valentine v. Richardt (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Watson v. Benz (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Weaver v. Bullis (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 579Ziegler v. Chapin (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Bell v. Bumstead (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Blake v. Harrigan (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Deyo v. Morss (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Ehrman v. Brooklyn City Railroad (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Hastings v. Claflin (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Hill v. Froehlick (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580In re Estate of Darling (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Morris, Tasker & Co. v. Chamberlain (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Nicoll v. Sands (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Ostrander v. Washburn (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Parmenter v. Fitzpatrick (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Parris v. Village of Green Island (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580People ex rel. Fitzpatrick v. Board of Supervisors (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580People ex rel. McCormack v. Weldon (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580People ex rel. Penfield v. George (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Pink v. Church (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Rogers v. Wiley (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Shaw v. Roberts (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Smith v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Stone v. City of Troy (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Straus v. Straus (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Thompson v. Leslie (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Toomey v. City of Albany (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Williams v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Larow v. Clute (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580McChesney v. Panama Railroad (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580People ex rel. Troy Press Co. v. Common Council of Troy (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580Downs v. Central Vermont Railroad (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 580In re the Widening Washington Street (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581Archibald v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581In re the Extension of Newland Avenue (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581Oberle v. Lang Manufacturing Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581People v. Jeffery (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581Baldwin's Bank of Penn Yan v. Butler (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581Beaudin v. Central Vermont Railroad (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581Bryant v. Town of Randolph (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581People v. Drown (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581Rock v. Doerr (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581Trimmer v. Fish (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581Addis v. Addis (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581Harley v. Buffalo Car Manufacturing Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581Spring v. Chautauqua Mutual Life Ass'n (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581St. John v. Swain (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581Griesa v. Massachusetts Benefit Ass'n (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581In re Certain Freeholders of Town of Montezuma (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581In re Maxwell (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581Lockwood v. Lockwood (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 581Rochester Electric-Light Co. v. Rochester Power Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 582Brand v. McMahon (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583French v. Brush-Swan Electric-Light Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583In re Kingsland (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Johnston v. Manhattan Railway Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Morton v. Palmer (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Prince Manufacturing Co. v. Prince's Metallic Paint Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Tauziede v. Jumel (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Babcock v. Schuylkill & Lehigh Valley Railroad (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Brennan v. Hall (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Dunlap's Cable News Co. v. Stone (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Dyer v. Power (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Gates v. McDonald (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Hooper v. Beecher (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583In re Kaufman (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Peck (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Keiley v. Mechanics & Traders' Bank (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Leavitt v. Miller (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Mackey v. Rausch (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583New York Life Insurance & Trust v. Livingston (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Olcott v. Powers (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Ottinger v. New York Elevated Railway Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Parker v. Linden (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583People ex rel. Gardner v. McClave (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583People v. Block (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583People v. Izzo (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583People v. New York Central Underground Railway Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Rice v. Grange (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Robbins v. Robbins (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Robinson v. Wood (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Starr v. Patterson (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Stephens v. Humphreys (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Union Distilling Co. v. Ruser (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Abbott v. Petersburg Granite Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 583Simis v. McElroy (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 584Langdon v. Mayor of New York (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 584In re the Dissolution of the Home Provident Safety Fund Ass'n (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Breichbeil v. Powles (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Brian v. Mead (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Colyer v. Williams (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Dexter v. Ivins (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Donnelly v. Woolsey (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Euggren v. Prinz (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Hartwick v. McGinnis (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585In re Citizens' Water-works Co. (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585In re Estate of Whitney (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585In re Long (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585In re Marvin (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585In re Petterson (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585In re Probate of Will of Portingall (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585In re Shay (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585In re the Estate of Dodge (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585In re the Estate of Ockershausen (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Larkin v. Brouty (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Malone v. Knowlton (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585McBride v. Orange County Railroad (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Olena v. Huntington (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Pentlarge v. Eddy (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585People v. Kane (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Quinby v. Claflin (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Rumsey v. New York & New England Railroad (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Sanger v. Merritt (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Sares v. Matthews (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Steffen v. Schaefer (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Underhill v. Collins (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Van Tassell v. Manhattan Eye & Ear Hospital (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Weill v. Malone (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Woermann v. Baas (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Wright v. Reusens (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585In re Estate of Stringer (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Kitson v. Blake (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585Miner v. Baron (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 585People ex rel. Morgan v. Board of Supervisors (1891)
- 67 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 586In re the Probate of the Will of Stewart (1891)