Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 Ohio App. 2d 105 - Syversten v. Carrelli

67 Ohio App. 2d 105 - Syversten v. Carrelli’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2016

7 state decisions

4019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Portage County Welfare Dept. v. Summers · Lucas County Commissioners v. Lucas County Budget Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The continuing jurisdiction in a divorce action of the Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, to determine the custody of a minor child does not deprive the Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division, of jurisdiction in adoption proceedings relating to that child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] Probate Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine an adoption proceeding relating to a minor child notwithstanding the fact that the custody of such child is at the time within the continuing jurisdiction of a divorce court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he juvenile court that has jurisdiction to determine custody of the minor, if the legal guardian or custodian of the minor is not authorized by law or court order to consent to the adoption.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.