67 Ohio App. 3d 467 - Booghier v. Wolfe’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Under R.C. 303.19, the use that is ‘grandfathered’ upon a change in zoning is only that use that was ‘existing and lawful’ as of the' date the zoning was changed. Here, the trial court found, and we think properly so, that use of the premises as an adult entertainment business did not exist when the zoning was changed, or that such use, as did exist or as was contemplated, was not lawful. ” (Citations omitted; emphasis sic.) Id., 67 Ohio App.3d at 473 , 587 N.E.2d at 378 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 123 Ohio App. 3d 511 - Interstate Independent Corp. v. Fayette County Board of Zoning Appeals