Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 Ohio App. 3d 608 - State v. Fyffe

67 Ohio App. 3d 608 - State v. Fyffe’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2012 · most notably 96 Ohio App. 3d 695 - State v. Vitale (1994), 112 Ohio App. 3d 124 - State v. Grinnell (1996)

26 state decisions

170199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dehass · State v. Adams · Harris v. United States · State v. Barnes · Scott v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The court on motion of a defendant or on its own motion, after the evidence on either side is closed, shall order the entry of a judgment of acquittal of one or more offenses charged in the indictment, information,- or complaint, if the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction of such offense or offenses. The court may not reserve ruling on a motion for judgment of acquittal made at the close of the state’s case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““A person acts knowingly, regardless of his purpose, when he is aware that his conduct will probably cause a certain result or will probably be of a certain nature. A person has knowledge of circumstances when he is aware that such circumstances probably exist.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]hen a question is before a trial court on a defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal, the trial court is required to construe the evidence most strongly in favor of the state, the party against whom the motion has been directed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.