Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 Ohio App. 3d 72 - State v. Green

67 Ohio App. 3d 72 - State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably 109 Ohio App. 3d 65 - State v. Brumback (1996), 120 Ohio App. 3d 320 - State v. Wills (1997)

25 state decisions

1001990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Stovall v. Denno · Manson v. Brathwaite

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is not a requirement for the use of photo arrays that all pictures shown must be of the same type. Neither is it required that they bear no differing marks or blemishes. Neither is it required that but one photo of an accused be used. The only inquiry is whether the photo or procedure used was `so impermissibly suggestive as to give rise to a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Poll of Jury. When a verdict is returned and before it is accepted the jury shall be polled at the request of any party or upon the court’s own motion. If upon the poll there is not unanimous concurrence, the jury may be directed to retire for further deliberation or may be discharged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Before the verdict is accepted, the jury may be polled at the request of either the prosecuting attorney or the defendant. If one of the jurors upon being polled declare that said verdict is not his verdict, the jury must further deliberate upon the case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.