67 Ohio App. 3d 760 - State v. Barnett’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably 145 Ohio App. 3d 555 - State v. Huff (2001), 127 Ohio App. 3d 511 - State v. Thompson (1998)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Simmons v. United States · Neil v. Biggers · Stovall v. Denno · Manson v. Brathwaite · Massiah v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The reliability of the identification depends upon the following factors: 1) the opportunity of the witness to see the perpetrator; 2) the witness' degree of attention; 3) the accuracy of the witness' prior description; 4) the witness' level of certainty in the identification; and 5) the length of time between the crime and the confrontation.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“[o]ne of the strongest of these external factors which may be used to prove the accuracy of the identification is the situation where the witness already knew the perpetrator before the crime was committed”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“* * * reliability is the linchpin in determining the admissibility of identification testimony * * *.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.