67 Ohio App. 3d 827 - State v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably 170 Ohio App. 3d 800 - State v. McConnell (2007), 107 Ohio App. 3d 578 - State v. Hodges (1995)
46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pelaes v. United States · 148 Ohio St. 505 - State v. Petro · 43 Ohio App. 3d 87 - City of Dayton v. Martin · 36 Ohio App. 3d 213 - State v. Arvanitis · 38 Ohio App. 3d 141 - State v. Eubank
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must afford the movant an opportunity to present evidence at a hearing in support of the motion and affidavit before electing whether to grant or to deny the motion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the trial court (cannot) properly discredit the affidavit on its face and deny the motion without a hearing, at least in the absence of internal inconsistencies in the affidavit sufficient to destroy its credibility on its face.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“shall be filed within seven days from an order of the court finding that he was unavoidably prevented from discovering the evidence within the one hundred twenty day period.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.