Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 OHIOST2D 99 - McCrory v. State

McCrory v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
October 2023
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion) (2021), 64 Ohio App. 3d 170 - Crosswhite v. Desai (1989)

42 state decisions

19019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co. · Alexander v. Mt. Carmel Medical Center · State v. Maupin · City of Akron v. Public Utilities Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to preclude testimony by the physician who earns his living or spends much of his time testifying against his fellows as a professional witness, and to prevent those whose lack of experiential background in the very field they seek to judge, the clinical practitioner, makes the validity of their opinions suspect, from expressing those opinions for pay or otherwise.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “three-fourths of his professional time to active clinical practice in his field of licensure, or to its instruction in an accredited university.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““The phrase ‘active clinical practice,’ contained in R.C. 2743.43(A), primarily describes those physicians who spend three-fourths of their professional time treating patients, but it also includes the physician-specialist whose work is so related or adjunctive to patient care as to be necessarily included in that definition for the purpose of determining fault or liability in a medical claim.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.