Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 OHIOST3D 200 - State v. Lewis

State v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 87 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2022 · most notably State v. Madrigal (2000), State v. Smith (1997)

3 federal appellate · 87 state decisions

7201993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jenks · State v. Maurer · State v. Jenkins · State v. Landrum · State v. Jamison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he Supreme Court of Ohio has held that `a new trial may be granted for misconduct of the jury when the substantial rights of the defendant have been materially affected.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.