¶1Reversed and remanded to the Board to determine under ORS 656.295(5) whether the case should be remanded to the referee, because it has been “improperly, incompletely or otherwise insufficiently developed or heard by the referee.” Bailey v. SAIF, 296 Or 41, 672 P2d 333 (1983).
67 Or. App. 11
Steimer v. Boise Cascade Corp.
Decided February 15, 1984
Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1984-02-15
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1987
1 district ·
Applies OR 656 § 656.295
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1984-02-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →