Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 P3D 673 - State v. Jack

State v. Jack’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2005
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2248 (§ 40113 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 7 · 43 U.S.C. § 1311

Relies on Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co. · American Banana Company v. United Fruit Company · Blackmer v. United States · United States v. California · Organized Village of Kake v. Egan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “AS 44.03.010 provides: The jurisdiction of the state extends to water offshore from the coast of the state as follows: (1) the marginal sea to its outermost limits as those limits are from time to time defined or recognized hy the United States of America by international treaty or otherwise; (2) the high seas to the extent that jurisdiction is claimed hy the United States of America, or to the extent recognized by the usages and customs of international law or by agreement to which the United States of America or the state is a party; (3) submerged land including the subsurface of submerged land, lying under the water mentioned in this section.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The jurisdiction of the state extends to water offshore from the coast of the state as follows: [[Image here]] (2) the high seas to the extent that jurisdiction is claimed by the United States of America, or to the extent recognized by the usages and customs of international law or by agreement to which the United States of America or the state is a party[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “The Court rejected the argument that the Prohibition Amendment covered ships `outside the waters of the United States, whether on the high seas or in foreign waters,' because `on the high seas ... there is no territorial sovereign.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.