¶1The opinion of the court below is a convincing answer to the argument of the appellant in this case, and there being nothing in this record to clearly show that the court below abused its discretion in refusing to open the judgment under the circumstances of the casé, the order made is affirmed.
67 Pa. Super. 123
Scranton v. Higfield
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 13, 1917
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1917-07-13
Appeal, No. 17, March T., 1917, by defendant, from order of 0. P. Lackawanna Co., March T., 1915, No. 786, discharging rule to open judgment in case of Grace F. Scranton v. George Highfleld. Buie to open judgment. The court filed the following opinion: Defendant was sued on his promissory note and the cause went to judgment against him by default for want .of an affidavit of defense.
Affirmed · Decided 1917-07-13