Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 SO2D 228 - Street v. Bartow Growers Processing Corp.

Street v. Bartow Growers Processing Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 1977
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1977

5 state decisions

20195319601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Realty Securities Corporation v. Johnson · 50 So. 2d 874 - Messana v. Maule Industries · Fote v. Reitano · Brite v. W. J. Howey Co. · Williams v. Penn Mut. Life Ins.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The party claiming fraud, misrepresentation or deceit cannot sit idly by and wait until conditions suit him to put the other party on notice or to take action with reference to rescission of a sales contract, or to claim damages because of a claimed inaccurate financial statement."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.