Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 SO2D 237 - Stark v. Frayer

Stark v. Frayer’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2017

6 state decisions

701953196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brickell v. Trammel · Tibbetts v. Olson · Shults v. Shults · Brecht v. Bur-Ne Co. · 37 So. 2d 696 - Collingsworth v. Mayo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he general rule is that an assertion in a judicial proceeding of an adverse claim, even though such a proceeding may have been terminated without a decree on the merits, will constitute a cloud on title which may be removed or confirmed in an equitable proceeding brought for that purpose.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.