Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

67 So. 3d 446

Stroh v. Stroh

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 24, 2011

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2011-08-24

Relies on 382 So. 2d 1197 - Canakaris v. Canakaris · 464 So. 2d 538 - Walter v. Walter

Decided 2011-08-24

STREITFELD, JEFFREY R., Associate Judge.

¶1 In this appeal from a Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage, we affirm the trial court’s award of permanent periodic alimony, equitable distribution plan, and alimony set-off. These awards are supported by competent, substantial evidence, and no abuse of discretion has been demonstrated. Walter v. Walter, 464 So.2d 538 (Fla.1985); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

¶2 We reverse the award of $4,000 constituting tenant security deposits, as this money was not marital property subject to equitable distribution and must be held by the Husband/Appellant as landlord.

¶3 Affirmed in part and Reversed in part.

STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.
/67/so3d/446 · .json · Public domain