Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 SW2D 254 - Kuntz v. Spence

Kuntz v. Spence’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently October 2014 · most notably Celanese Corp. v. John Clark Industries, Inc. (1954), El Paso Field Services, L.P. and Gulfterra South Texas, L.P. F/K/A El Paso South Texas, L.P. v. Mastec North America, Inc. and Mastec, Inc. (2012)

7 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

130193419401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on American Indemnity Co. v. Fellbaum · Connolly v. Bolster · Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. Morrison · Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Martin · Frye v. Bath Gas & Electric Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * we judicially know that juries, are much more apt to return a verdict for the injured party, and for -a larger amount, if they know the loss is to ultimately fall on an insurance company.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.