Conner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
89
cited by 89 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 87 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Simmons v. United States · Stovall v. Denno · Jurek v. Texas · Scharffe v. Perkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When conducting a sufficiency review, we consider all the evidence admitted, whether proper or improper.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“clear disparity between the degree of prejudice of the offered evidence and its probative value”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Mechler · Newton v. State“Each fact need not point directly and independently to the guilt of the appellant, as long as the cumulative force of all the incriminating circumstances is sufficient to support the conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rush v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.