Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 S.W.3d 85 - Perry v. Del Rio

Perry v. Del Rio’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 353rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control Board · Florida v. Tyvessel Tyvorus White · Growe v. Emison · Connor v. Finch · Bush v. Al Vera Lawson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he Attorney General can only act within the limits of the Texas Constitution and statutes, and courts cannot enlarge the Attorney General’s powers.”). . Tex. Ins.Code § 541.251(a) (formerly art. 21.21, § 17(a)). . Id. . See, e.g., Tex. Bus. & Com Code §§ 36.25, 38.302; Tex. Bus. Orgs.Code § 21.802(d); Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code § 15.020(c)(1); Tex. Educ.Code § 44.032(f); Tex. Health & Safety Code §§ 161.404(d), 161.405, 361.341, 464.015(d); Tex Ins.Code § 751.004(c); Tex. Lab.Code § 410.252(b); Tex.R. Civ. P. 38, 93(15), 117a(5); but cf. id. 13 (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Dismissing a case on jurisdictional grounds may be frustrating to judges and litigants alike, particularly when issues of statewide import are involved .... However, the Legislature has chosen to make direct appeal an uncommon remedy, available only in rare and specific situations. Regardless of the day’s exigencies, our highest and only duty is to respect the appropriate limits of our power.... I fear that our Court has allowed a hard case to make bad law today. 45”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “We have recognized that our due course of law provision at a minimum requires notice and an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.... This right [to be heard] also includes an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses, to produce witnesses, and to be heard on questions of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. In Re SP

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.