Gonzales v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited
25 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. State · State v. Daugherty · Comer v. State · Roquemore v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]vidence is not `obtained in violation' of a provision of law if there is no causal connection between the illegal conduct and the acquisition of the evidence.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gonzales v. State · Pham v. State“§ 52.02(b) is not an independent exclusionary statute”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gonzales v. State · Pham v. State“The entire process, from the moment of appellant's arrest until later release to the juvenile detention facility, lasted about five hours. The arresting officer made no attempt to notify appellant's parents. Furthermore the record suggests that appellant's parents were not notified of his arrest until he was processed into the juvenile detention facility, five to six hours after he was initially taken into custody.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gonzales v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.