Richardson v. Levi’s Empirical Analysis
1887
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 94 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co. (1940), City of Beaumont v. Moore (1947)
4 federal appellate · 94 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“• “The court, in holding that the deed before them, which conveyed only the right, title, and interest of the grantor, did not protect the grantee against a previous trust with which the land ‡ * *, was charged, said that if it had been a conveyance of the land, instead of the right, title, and interest of the grantor, it might be necessary to inquire whether the registration or possession of the opposing claimant was notice to the grantee. But they say, as he only took the grantor’s right, he took nothing which the latter had previously conveyed. The very terms of the deed were notice to him of all the rights previously conferred upon others by his grantor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Baldwin v. Drew““it may now be regarded as the settled law of this state that a party receiving a quitclaim deed to land cannot be deemed a bona fide purchaser, without notice, of any greater interest therein than his grantor had at the date of the execution of the deed.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Meacham v. Halley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.