Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 U.S. 499 - Noonan v. Lee

Noonan v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

67 U.S. 499 · 1862

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
March 1962
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 9 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1962 · most notably Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co. (1932), Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co. (1932)

19 federal appellate · 9 district · 21 state decisions — followed in 10 states

15018621870188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wheeler v. Russell · Moore v. Vail

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As the facts are disclosed in the record we find no defect in the title of Lee. We find that Noonan’s title has not failed, and no incumbrance upon the property is shown. There has been, therefore, no breach of the agreement indorsed on the bond, nor has there been any breach of the covenant of general warranty in Lee’s deed to Noonan.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““A majority of my brethren are of the opinion, and I am directed by them so to announce, that in the absence of a l'Ule of this court authorizing it to be done, it was not competent for the court below to make such an order.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.