Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 Wash. 2d 268 - Baske v. Russell

67 Wash. 2d 268 - Baske v. Russell’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
states following
August 1995
most recently cited

2 district · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 1995 · most notably 93 Wash. 2d 881 - Liebergesell v. Evans (1980), 90 Wash. 2d 680 - O'Brien v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc. (1978)

2 district · 28 state decisions

1901965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wooddy v. Benton Water Co. · 22 Wash. 2d 378 - Hafer v. Spaeth · Motor Contract Co. v. Van Der Volgen · Eastman v. . Shaw · American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Helgesen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “adversity and necessity of economic life”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] note for which value has once been given can be discounted at any rate, but . . . the discount of paper for which no value has been previously given must be added to the interest provided for in determining the interest rate, and if this exceeds the rate of interest allowed by the statute, the defense of usury is available.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) a loan or forbearance, express or implied; (2) money or its equivalent constituting the subject matter of the loan or forbearance; (3) an understanding between the parties that the principal shall be repayable absolutely; (4) the exaction of something in excess of what is allowed by law for the use of the money loaned or for the benefit of the forbearance; and, in some jurisdictions, (5) an intent to exact more than the legal maximum for the loan or forbearance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.