Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 67 Wash. 2d 487 - Treffry v. Taylor

67 Wash. 2d 487 - Treffry v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
4
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently October 2011 · most notably 88 Wash. 2d 221 - State v. Wanrow (1977), 89 Wash. 2d 592 - Childers v. Childers (1978)

52 state decisions

150196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. Clausen · 35 Wash. 2d 1 - Gruen v. State Tax Commission · 61 Wash. 2d 374 - Miller v. City of Tacoma · 56 Wash. 2d 425 - Clark v. Dwyer · 62 Wash. 2d 362 - State v. Persinger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A legislative enactment requiring the registration of contractors is an exercise of the police power of the state. . . . The only limitation upon the exercise of this sovereign power by a legislative body is that the questioned enactment must reasonably tend to correct some evil or promote some public interest, and that it must not be violative of any positive mandate of the constitution.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`need not be an index to its contents; nor is the title expected to give the details contained in the bill.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The test of the sufficiency of a title is that it must give notice of its object so as reasonably to lead to an inquiry into its contents. (Citing cases.) The title to an act may be general, and all matters incidental or germane thereto may be written into the body of the law. (Citing cases.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.