67 Wash. 2d 506 - State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2021
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 47 Wash. 2d 563 - In RE McNUTT v. Delmore · 62 Wash. 2d 118 - State v. Oswalt · 51 Wash. 2d 182 - State v. Williams · 56 Wash. 2d 589 - State Ex Rel. Sharf v. MUNICIPAL CT. OF SEATTLE · 51 Wash. 2d 446 - Dods v. Harrison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Every person who shall have in his possession or shall permit to be placed or kept in any building ... or part thereof, owned, leased or occupied by him, any table ... or any other article, device or apparatus of a kind commonly used for gambling, or operated for the losing or winning of any money . . . upon any chance or uncertain or contingent event, shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[defendant's offer of proof referred] to no specific acts, conduct or statements on the part of the witness, but vaguely tend[ed] to show bias in the most indefinite and speculative way, appear [ing] too remote to meet the purpose for which it was offered . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[This recital] being formal and apparently not affecting the validity of the judgment and sentence may, on notice to the defendant, be corrected by the trial court without its vacating the judgment and sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.